<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Future of Documents</title>
	<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com</link>
	<description>I am in charge of ingesting smarter document technologies into Xerox, by taking innovative, thought leading ideas and applying them to real world applications. My group has a unique position between Xerox Research which I originate from, and our services operations, field and sales people. Our mission is to make smarter document management pervasive to all of Xerox\'s services and realize our vision of the document of the future.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on ODF, OOXML,&#8230; and UOF ? by The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;ODF has clearly won&#8221;, Microsoft says</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/01/04/odf-ooxml-and-uof/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;ODF has clearly won&#8221;, Microsoft says</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/01/04/odf-ooxml-and-uof/#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] China&#8217;s UOF actually becomes a significant player [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] China&#8217;s UOF actually becomes a significant player [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Less Paper in the Mortgage industry by Steve</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/06/20/less-paper-in-the-mortgage-industry/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/06/20/less-paper-in-the-mortgage-industry/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Now... I know i'm being pedantic and nit-picky, but in a world where Xerox have tried to "de-verb" itself (you copy a document on a Xerox machine, you do not "xerox" a document, should we be using "fedexed" as a verb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now&#8230; I know i&#8217;m being pedantic and nit-picky, but in a world where Xerox have tried to &#8220;de-verb&#8221; itself (you copy a document on a Xerox machine, you do not &#8220;xerox&#8221; a document, should we be using &#8220;fedexed&#8221; as a verb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The OOXML saga continues&#8230; by Mark Jackson</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/06/03/the-ooxml-saga-continues/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/06/03/the-ooxml-saga-continues/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>And if you don't want to have to enable Flash and other active content in order to read the paper in a format the author himself says is unclear, take his suggestion and grab it in PDF from &lt;a href="ftp://officeboxsystems.com/odfa_ukag/ODFA%20UKAG%20Technical%20White%20Paper.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you don&#8217;t want to have to enable Flash and other active content in order to read the paper in a format the author himself says is unclear, take his suggestion and grab it in PDF from <a href="ftp://officeboxsystems.com/odfa_ukag/ODFA%20UKAG%20Technical%20White%20Paper.pdf" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/officeboxsystems.com');">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ISO and IEC approve Open Office XML format by The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The OOXML saga continues&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/04/02/iso-and-iec-approve-open-office-xml-format/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The OOXML saga continues&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/04/02/iso-and-iec-approve-open-office-xml-format/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>[...] India and South Africa have appealed against ISO&#8217;s approval of OOXML as a standard. Denmark protested too. Oh well&#8230; this might not be the end of the story after [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] India and South Africa have appealed against ISO&#8217;s approval of OOXML as a standard. Denmark protested too. Oh well&#8230; this might not be the end of the story after [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft opens up Office to open document formats by ODF Support added to Microsoft Office System - Additional Reading : Oliver Bell&#8217;s weblog</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/05/22/microsoft-opens-up-office-to-open-document-formats/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>ODF Support added to Microsoft Office System - Additional Reading : Oliver Bell&#8217;s weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/05/22/microsoft-opens-up-office-to-open-document-formats/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] Francois Ragnet - &#8220;Microsoft opens up Office to open document formats&#8221; Interesting to see how Microsoft have moved away from their proprietary document formats, which were previously considered as their “crown jewels”, and now focus their innovation efforts on the applications themselves. More surprising though, is the fact that Office 2007 will not support OOXML, Microsoft’s own competing format for ODF, which they recently “fast-tracked” through ISO approval. In any event, this is great news for the Future of Documents, as this is a major step towards one open document format for easy interchange between applications. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Francois Ragnet - &#8220;Microsoft opens up Office to open document formats&#8221; Interesting to see how Microsoft have moved away from their proprietary document formats, which were previously considered as their “crown jewels”, and now focus their innovation efforts on the applications themselves. More surprising though, is the fact that Office 2007 will not support OOXML, Microsoft’s own competing format for ODF, which they recently “fast-tracked” through ISO approval. In any event, this is great news for the Future of Documents, as this is a major step towards one open document format for easy interchange between applications. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ISO and IEC approve Open Office XML format by The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft opens up Office to open document formats</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/04/02/iso-and-iec-approve-open-office-xml-format/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft opens up Office to open document formats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/04/02/iso-and-iec-approve-open-office-xml-format/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>[...] More surprising though, is the fact that Office 2007 will not support OOXML, Microsoft&#8217;s own competing format for ODF, which they recently &#8220;fast-tracked&#8221; through ISO approval. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More surprising though, is the fact that Office 2007 will not support OOXML, Microsoft&#8217;s own competing format for ODF, which they recently &#8220;fast-tracked&#8221; through ISO approval. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going green: What&#8217;s good for the Environment is Good for Business by Felicia W.</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/05/16/going-green-whats-good-for-the-environment-is-good-for-business/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/05/16/going-green-whats-good-for-the-environment-is-good-for-business/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I think going green is something that everyone can agree is a step in the right direction toward building a better community, and laying down the foundations for which future generations can successfully thrive in a healthier environment. Plus, I think many businesses will benefit from going green, not only building a more acceptable public persona, but in the long run it really helps companies save money and be a positive contributor to the world we live in. 

Another thing I want to talk about is bioheat, it's just one small measure that people can take in order to start living a greener lifestyle. Has anyone ever heard of it, or has switched to it? I want to start taking initiative in turning my home into a greener household, one way I have started is by switching out all my lightbulbs in my home to energy efficient lightbulbs. And I am also seriously considering switching over to bioheat as an alternative to regular oilheat. The thing that I love the most about it is that it's completely clean burning, and is comprised of a b5 blend of oils which are derived from natural plant and vegetable sustainable resources such as corn, hemp, and avocados just to name a few. If you all want more information on how bioheat, just go on to http://oilheatamerica.com/index.mv?screen=bioheat I work with NORA to bring this info to you all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think going green is something that everyone can agree is a step in the right direction toward building a better community, and laying down the foundations for which future generations can successfully thrive in a healthier environment. Plus, I think many businesses will benefit from going green, not only building a more acceptable public persona, but in the long run it really helps companies save money and be a positive contributor to the world we live in. </p>
<p>Another thing I want to talk about is bioheat, it&#8217;s just one small measure that people can take in order to start living a greener lifestyle. Has anyone ever heard of it, or has switched to it? I want to start taking initiative in turning my home into a greener household, one way I have started is by switching out all my lightbulbs in my home to energy efficient lightbulbs. And I am also seriously considering switching over to bioheat as an alternative to regular oilheat. The thing that I love the most about it is that it&#8217;s completely clean burning, and is comprised of a b5 blend of oils which are derived from natural plant and vegetable sustainable resources such as corn, hemp, and avocados just to name a few. If you all want more information on how bioheat, just go on to <a href="http://oilheatamerica.com/index.mv?screen=bioheat" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/oilheatamerica.com');">http://oilheatamerica.com/index.mv?screen=bioheat</a> I work with NORA to bring this info to you all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XML or PDF-A for archiving ? by The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using PDF for long-term document preservation</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2007/10/29/xml-or-pdf-a-for-archiving/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using PDF for long-term document preservation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2007/10/29/xml-or-pdf-a-for-archiving/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>[...] you remember my blog on XML or PDF-A for archiving, this is fully in line with what I have been advocating for - you need to make sure whatever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you remember my blog on XML or PDF-A for archiving, this is fully in line with what I have been advocating for - you need to make sure whatever [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenXML approved as ISO standard ? by Matthew G. Saroff</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/03/31/openxml-approved-as-iso-standard/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew G. Saroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2008/03/31/openxml-approved-as-iso-standard/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say, "sorry, once again I got a prediction wrong."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say, &#8220;sorry, once again I got a prediction wrong.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The expanding digital universe by The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Footprint Calculator</title>
		<link>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2007/05/22/the-expanding-digital-universe/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Documents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Footprint Calculator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://futureofdocuments.blogs.xerox.com/2007/05/22/the-expanding-digital-universe/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>[...] those of you that are familiar with my blog, you might remember my first post on the topic and the humongous estimate of the Digital Universe; This report and estimate has been revised, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] those of you that are familiar with my blog, you might remember my first post on the topic and the humongous estimate of the Digital Universe; This report and estimate has been revised, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
